← Back to blog

Link Building · July 31, 2026 · 7 min read

HARO Is Dead — Here Are the Journalist-Request Platforms Winning in 2026

HARO alternatives in 2026: Featured, Qwoted, and SourceBottle fill the gap after Connectively shut down. Here's how to choose the right platform.

By FluxWriter Team

If you've been searching for HARO alternatives recently, you already know the landscape shifted fast. Connectively — the platform Cision rebranded HARO into — shut down in December 2025, leaving thousands of PR professionals and SEO practitioners scrambling for replacements. The good news: several platforms have matured enough to fill the gap, and in some ways the options are better than HARO ever was.

What Actually Happened to HARO and Connectively

Help a Reporter Out launched in 2008 and became the default place for sources to pitch journalists at scale. Cision acquired it, rebranded it as Connectively in early 2024, and then quietly killed the platform less than two years later. The stated reason was low engagement, but the underlying reality was simpler: the inbox became unusable. Journalists on the free tier were receiving 500+ daily pitches for a single query, response rates had fallen below 3% on many queries, and spam had proliferated so aggressively that several major newsrooms stopped using the platform entirely.

Connectively closed its doors on December 9, 2025. Any backlinks or coverage you were tracking through that pipeline now needs a new source.

The Current Contenders

Featured (featured.com)

Featured entered the market as a direct HARO alternative and currently claims to have over 50,000 experts and 2,500+ publications in its network. The vetting model is its main differentiator: sources complete a profile with credentials, topic categories, and writing samples before they can respond to queries.

Journalists post questions, experts respond, and Featured editors curate the best answers before forwarding a shortlist. This curation layer is what journalists cite most often when explaining why they switched. Instead of sifting through hundreds of raw pitches, they receive a vetted batch of five to ten.

For SEOs pursuing editorial backlinks, the trade-off is real: you get higher-quality placement opportunities, but the barrier to entry is also higher. A generic "marketing expert" profile will not move you to the front of the queue. Specific credentials and tight topic focus outperform broad claims.

Pricing: Free tier exists with limited responses per month; paid plans start around $99/month for higher response limits and priority placement.

Qwoted

Qwoted takes a more journalist-first approach. The platform requires verified press credentials to post queries, which has kept the query volume lower but the quality significantly higher than HARO's final years. Queries go out to a targeted audience based on source expertise tags, rather than blasting every subscriber.

The platform is used by journalists at the Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and Business Insider. That nameplate quality is the main reason to use it — you're not chasing volume, you're chasing specificity.

One concrete example: a cybersecurity SaaS company targeting enterprise IT publications reported a 19% pitch-to-quote rate on Qwoted in Q1 2026, compared to roughly 4% on HARO in its last active year. Smaller numbers, higher hit rate.

Pricing: Free for sources; Qwoted Pro at $49/month adds response analytics and alerts.

SourceBottle

SourceBottle is the oldest surviving platform in this space — it predates HARO — and is particularly strong for Australian and UK markets. If your link-building targets include .com.au domains or British publications, SourceBottle should be in rotation.

The email digest model is similar to how HARO operated at its best: daily or twice-daily emails broken into categories (Business, Health, Technology, etc.). There's no curation layer, but the total volume is low enough that quality doesn't collapse the way it did on Connectively. Most U.S.-based SEOs ignore it, which means less competition for the queries that do come through.

Pricing: Free for basic access; Pro tier unlocks keyword alerts and priority listing.

ProfNet (PR Newswire)

ProfNet is the enterprise tier of this ecosystem. It runs on the PR Newswire network and is primarily used by academic institutions and corporations with active PR teams. Queries skew toward expert commentary for news stories rather than feature articles.

For a solo consultant or a small agency, ProfNet's pricing (typically $300+/month) is hard to justify. For in-house PR teams at mid-to-large organizations targeting tier-one media, it's worth evaluating.

Help a B2B Writer

This is a niche option specifically for B2B tech and SaaS. It's a newsletter run by Ryan Law (formerly of Animalz) that connects journalists and content strategists with B2B sources. The list is small, free, and has no formal vetting — but the audience match is unusually tight for companies in that vertical.

If you sell developer tools, enterprise software, or anything in the SaaS stack, subscribe and monitor it alongside a primary platform.

How to Choose the Right Platform

The right platform depends on three variables: your target publication tier, your topic coverage area, and your team's capacity to respond consistently.

A practical starting point for most teams: activate Featured and Qwoted simultaneously, set up SourceBottle if your targets include AU/UK domains, and run all three for 60 days before deciding where to concentrate effort. Response rates vary by topic category, so early data will tell you more than any platform comparison.

What Makes a Source Profile Actually Work

Platform selection is only half the problem. The other half is how you present the source.

A strong profile on any of these platforms does three things: it names a specific area of expertise (not "marketing" but "B2B SaaS email onboarding sequences"), it lists verifiable credentials (job title, company, relevant publications), and it demonstrates voice through a short writing sample or bio.

Journalists on Featured and Qwoted filter by expertise tags before they read a single word of a pitch. If your tags are too broad, you'll miss queries that match you perfectly. If they're too narrow, you'll miss volume. The right balance is usually three to five tightly worded tags per source profile.

FAQ

Is there a free HARO replacement that works? Yes. Featured and Qwoted both offer free tiers. SourceBottle is fully free at the basic level. None of them match the sheer query volume HARO had at its peak, but volume was never the useful part — response rates were collapsing long before Connectively shut down. The free tiers on these platforms are functional starting points.

How long does it take to get a backlink through these platforms? Timelines vary. A query response can turn into a published article in as little as 48 hours for news-driven content, or sit in an editorial queue for four to eight weeks for feature articles. Tracking by platform and journalist — not just by query — helps you spot which outlets actually publish quickly.

Can I use multiple platforms at once without duplicating responses? Yes, and you should. Query audiences overlap slightly but not completely. Responding to the same topic from different angles on different platforms is fine. Sending the identical response text to multiple queries about the same topic is not — editors notice templated pitches, and it will hurt your acceptance rate.

The Practical Takeaway

HARO built the journalist-request link-building category. Connectively burned it down by letting the signal-to-noise ratio collapse. The platforms that survive in its place — Featured, Qwoted, SourceBottle — have all learned something from that failure and built in friction that keeps quality higher.

Pick two platforms that match your geography and publication targets, build tight source profiles, and respond consistently for 60 days. That's more productive than waiting for a single replacement to dominate the market the way HARO once did.

If you're managing responses across multiple platforms alongside other link-building outreach, tools like FluxWriter can help organize the workflow so source pitching doesn't eat your entire content calendar.

← All posts